Debate intensifies on allowing asylum seekers to work amid rising costs and public scrutiny.
Immigration has become a critical political issue in Britain, particularly as Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s government faces increased pressure to manage record numbers of asylum seekers. A significant concern is the influx of individuals arriving on small boats from France, which has led to heated discussions surrounding the treatment and support provided to these individuals.
Recently, hotels housing asylum seekers have been at the center of intense demonstrations, some of which have escalated into violence. Protesters have voiced their frustrations, claiming that asylum seekers are receiving more financial support and benefits compared to British nationals. This situation has prompted the Starmer administration to announce plans to close all asylum hotels by the next election in 2029, as costs associated with hosting asylum seekers have skyrocketed into the billions of pounds.
In addition to the closure of hotels, the government has paused a visa scheme that permitted registered refugees to bring their families into the country. However, many charities advocate for a policy change that would allow asylum seekers to work while their applications are processed, a procedure that can sometimes take over a year. They argue that permitting asylum seekers to enter the workforce could alleviate tensions and lessen the financial strain on public resources.
Official data reveals that over 111,000 individuals claimed asylum in Britain last year. Typically, asylum seekers receive approximately 49.18 pounds ($67) weekly, with slightly higher amounts available for those with children or who are pregnant. They also have access to free basic healthcare and education for their children, as well as accommodation when needed. Under the European Convention on Human Rights, the UK is obliged to provide housing for asylum seekers facing destitution.
As of June, more than 32,000 migrants were being housed in over 200 hotels across the country. Currently, asylum seekers can work only if their initial application decision exceeds 12 months, and they are limited to jobs on a shortage list that includes roles in engineering, IT, and finance. In contrast, European Union member states are required to allow asylum seekers to work after a six-month waiting period. Countries like Canada, Australia, Portugal, and Sweden permit asylum seekers to work immediately after submitting their applications, contingent on meeting specific criteria.
Advocates for allowing asylum seekers to work highlight several potential benefits. These include reduced government spending on asylum support, increased tax revenue, and improved integration of migrants into society. A report from the National Institute of Economic and Social Research indicates that granting work rights could lead to an increase in annual tax revenue of 1.3 billion pounds, a reduction in government spending of 6.7 billion pounds, and an increase in gross domestic product by 1.6 billion pounds.
Despite these potential advantages, there are concerns about the implications for the asylum seekers themselves. A 2023 government report notes that they could be vulnerable to exploitation, as they might accept poor working conditions due to their temporary status. Additionally, language barriers, unrecognized qualifications, and discrimination from employers may pose further challenges for these individuals.
