NEW DELHI — The Indian Air Force (IAF) is currently facing a critical depletion of its air combat strength, operating with just 29 fighter squadrons against a sanctioned requirement of 42.5 to handle a potential "two-front" security challenge. At the heart of resolving this crisis is the long-pending Multi-Role Fighter Aircraft (MRFA) program to procure 114 advanced fighter jets.
While recent months have seen significant progress—with the government issuing a formal Letter of Request (LoR) to France for 114 Rafale jets under a mega ₹3.25 lakh crore deal—the program has taken nearly a decade to reach this stage. This extensive timeline raises a crucial question for national security observers: Who is responsible for the prolonged delay—the government or the air security forces?
## The Core of the Issue: Understanding the Delay
The MRFA process effectively began after the original Medium Multi-Role Combat Aircraft (MMRCA) tender was scrapped, resulting in the emergency off-the-shelf purchase of 36 Rafale jets in 2016. A fresh Request for Information (RFI) for 114 jets was issued in 2018. However, the finalization of the contract has faced years of bureaucratic and technical gridlock.
To understand why it has taken so long, military analysts point to two distinct perspectives within India's defense establishment.
### Perspective 1: The Government’s Focus on Economy and Self-Reliance
Defense experts note that the civilian government's delays are rarely due to a lack of political will, but rather strict adherence to two major policy pillars:
The "Make in India" Mandate: The government has refused to simply buy 114 jets directly from a foreign factory. Under the current 2026 framework, the government is insisting that around 90 to 94 of these jets must be manufactured domestically by an Indian partner with up to 50% indigenous content. Setting up these complex joint ventures takes immense time.
Fiscal Responsibility: A ₹3.25 lakh crore ($39+ billion) expenditure is one of the largest defense deals in India's history. The Ministry of Finance and defense procurement boards must ensure absolute financial transparency and price negotiations to protect public funds, preventing rushed decisions.
### Perspective 2: The Air Force's Evolving Technical Demands
On the other side, critics occasionally point to the military's changing requirements as a source of delay. However, the Air Force argues that these demands are vital for long-term security:
Strict Source Code Demands:The IAF has stood firm on non-negotiable conditions, such as obtaining the software source codes from the manufacturer. This allows Indian engineers to integrate domestic weapons (like the Astra missile) without needing foreign permission. Negotiating these sovereign technology transfers is notoriously difficult.
The High Benchmark: The IAF requires a 4.5-generation fighter that can seamlessly communicate with existing platforms. Ensuring that the chosen aircraft fits perfectly into India's complex defense ecosystem requires years of rigorous technical evaluation.
## Current Status: The Deadlock Breaks
The blame cannot be placed entirely on one door; rather, it is the result of a complex push-and-pull between the IAF’s urgent operational needs and the government’s structural demand for domestic production.
The impasse is finally clearing. Following clearances from the Defence Procurement Board and the Defence Acquisition Council, the formal process with France has officially begun. The final contract is expected to undergo intense price negotiations before receiving the ultimate nod from the Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS).
Legal Disclaimer
General News Disclaimer:The information provided in this news report is intended for general informational and educational purposes only. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and reliability of the facts presented, the details are based on publicly available defense records, official ministry briefings, and reputable news media statements up to the date of publication. This report does not reflect the personal opinions of the reporter or the broadcasting network, nor does it intend to defame, misrepresent, or assign legal liability to the Government of India, the Ministry of Defence, the Indian Armed Forces, or any foreign entity. Readers are advised to cross-reference defense procurement details with official government portals, as military contracts are subject to ongoing bureaucratic, financial, and strategic revisions.